The Importance of Fully Executed Crane Rental Tickets

August 2015


The Importance of Fully Executed Crane Rental Tickets
By: Matthew Shorr, Esq.
 
Matthew Shorr In the article, “The Importance of Fully Executed Crane Rental Tickets” published by Crane & Rigging Hot Line, Attorney Matthew Shorr expands on the importance of an enforceable agreement for indemnity under California law. California Labor Code 3864 immunizes an employer from civil liability when an employee is injured during the course and scope of their employment, unless an express contract of indemnity has been executed by the employer and the crane service provider prior to injury. If a construction site incident involving a crane causes serious injuries or fatalities, the crane service provider may tender its defense and indemnity if an enforceable written indemnity agreement is in place. In the non-employer/employee context, an agreement for indemnity may be established through the parties’ course of dealings.
 
Ride Sharing Apps: 
Liability and Coverage Issues 
Webinar Recording Now Available!
In our most recent webinar, “Ride Sharing Apps: Liability and Coverage Issues,” Attorneys Timothy Thornton and Matthew Shorr discuss new California insurance requirements effective in 2015 and how they’re applied to different phases of a trip, the differences between business and personal auto policies, and an overview of enacted laws in the United States and other bills/approaches.

 

Timothy Thornton Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2016
Partner Timothy Thornton was selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2016 list. Mr. Thornton has been listed since 2011 for his work in insurance law.

For more than three decades, Best Lawyers® has become regarded as the definitive guide to legal professionalism and excellence around the globe. Best Lawyers® is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey. More than 52,000 leading attorneys cast 5.5 million votes on the legal abilities of other lawyers in more than 130 practice areas.


Gray·Duffy, LLP Selected for Inclusion on the 2015 List of California’s Top Ranked Law Firms
Gray·Duffy, LLP was selected for inclusion on the 2015 list of Martindale-Hubbell’s California’s Top Ranked Law Firms. The firm has been named to the list for more than 20 consecutive years.

Martindale-Hubbell’s criteria to be listed as a Top Law Firm includes being headquartered in California with 10 or more attorneys and at least one out of five attorneys maintaining an AV Preeminent® rating. An AV Preeminent® rating signifies an attorney’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence.

Hear From Our Clients*

Gray·Duffy, LLP and Nathan Lee are extremely professional and prompt, and always get right to the heart of the matter. No stone was left unturned. I would highly recommend them to anyone seeking quality counsel. I would definitely retain them again in the future.”

-Alan Friedson, Client

*These endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.
So You Think You Know The Law?
True or False?

Automobiles owned by drivers working for “transportation network companies” such as Uber and Lyft are insured for comprehensive and collision under the “transportation network company” policies for physical damage while logged onto the ride sharing app.

True or False?
The new “transportation network company” law in California requires that “transportation network companies” such as Uber and Lyft provide $1,000,000 in liability coverage during all times the driver has the ride sharing app turned on, whether the driver is waiting for a summons, going to get a passenger, or carrying a passenger.


True or False?
If a driver for a “transportation network company” such as Uber and Lyft provides his or her own automobile, he or she is automatically considered an independent contractor.
Real Estate Corner

Public Dog Parks Not Liable for Injury Caused by Dogs


A city, county or other public entity that owns or operates a dog park is not liable for injury to, or death of, a person or pet resulting solely from the actions of a dog in a dog park. As background, existing law provides that the owner of any dog is liable for damages suffered by any person bitten by a dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place (Cal. Civil Code § 3342). Assembly Bill 265 (codified as Cal. Gov’t Code § 831.7.5) (effective January 1, 2014).

About     Practice Areas     Profiles     Testimonials         

Please Note: This article is necessarily general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice with respect to any particular case. Readers should consult with an attorney before taking any action affecting their interests.