Gray•Duffy, LLP Negotiates Resolution of Claims Against Roofing Subcontractor in Multiparty Construction Defect Action
November 2014
Overview
Patrick Roberts of Gray•Duffy’s Encino office successfully negotiated the resolution of substantial claims against the firm’s roofing subcontractor client in a construction defect lawsuit involving 26 residences located in San Clemente, California. The Plaintiffs originally alleged the total cost of repair was $218,452.04 for roofing related issues.Discussion
Flynn Baglin, et al. v. Brookfield Homes, et al. The Developer’s initial demand to the firm’s client included an indemnity demand of $250,000 and a separate demand in the amount of $315,000, for a total settlement demand of $565,000. After substantial negotiations through several rounds of mediation, the case was ultimately settled for $10,000.Please Note: This article is necessarily general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice with respect to any particular case. Readers should consult with an attorney before taking any action affecting their interests.