Why Your Mediation Brief May Be Failing — And How to Fix It

May 2025

Why Your Mediation Brief May Be Failing — And How to Fix It 

Published: Daily Journal The Resolution Issue 2025


If you ask attorneys what their number one pet peeve is about how mediations are handled, a common response is often mediators who push a position that is supported by very little evidence, relying instead on arguments and unsupported briefing. This issue is frequently cited as a primary frustration among lawyers and their clients.


THE ROLE OF A WELL-CRAFTED MEDIATION BRIEF


The importance of a well-crafted mediation brief, supported by legal authority and credible evidence, cannot be overstated. It is clear that the quality and substance of these documents play a pivotal role in the effectiveness and outcome of the mediation process.


Lawyers take various positions about their briefs. Some write a short “letter brief” with mostly arguments and posturing, and insufficient evidence supporting those arguments. While others offer thoughtful, evidence-based submissions, supported by appropriate legal authorities and case-based discovery. The spectrum is broad, and the impact on the mediator and the process can be equally disparate.


CONSEQUENCES OF UNSUPPORTED POSITIONS

A recent example involved a mediator who adopted and pushed for settlement with a position completely unsupported by evidence, causing significant frustration for the attorney and client. In this instance, opposing counsel had conducted no discovery, and simply filed and served a complaint and nothing else. Then six months later, they found themselves in an expensive mediation, making a high six-figure demand, entirely lacking evidentiary support. Needless to say, the attorney was very frustrated by all of this since the mediator was posturing the case for a substantial settlement without any evidentiary basis to support either the liability or damages being claimed. The case did not settle, and the attorney and their client, who had submitted a comprehensive brief with supporting authority and evidence, were extremely disappointed by the process and the mediator’s actions. Unfortunately, this can happen with even the most experienced mediators.


BEST PRACTICES FOR EFFECTIVE MEDIATION BRIEFS


Briefs and evidence are critical to the process and should be clear, concise documents used to convey a position to the mediator and the other side, supported by law and evidence. Not submitting a brief, or a brief lacking such substance, has little value to the mediator and can actually impede the settlement process.


Briefs should always: 


  1. Be clear, concise, non-argumentative
  2. Be supported by discovery and other evidence
  3. Be shared with the other side
  4. Not “hide the ball”
  5. Acknowledge the strengths/weaknesses of the other side
  6. State a proposed settlement position in unambiguous terms


In cases where confidential information must be withheld from the opposing side, a “mediator’s eyes only” letter or brief may be appropriate and submitted to the mediator. However, such information often proves necessary for settlement and should be disclosed with permission when beneficial to the process.


A CRITICAL TOOL FOR RESOLUTION


If a brief follows the above guidelines, the case has a much greater chance of resolution in the hands of an experienced, thoughtful mediator. The mediation brief is an important, if not essential, part of the process and should not be overlooked as an important tool for all parties involved. An unsupported position by a party, if adopted by a mediator as a point of reference for a settlement, can and will kill the process.


Practitioners should do the necessary preparation if they want to increase the likelihood of a successful mediation. This includes conducting discovery, crafting a mediation brief that utilizes evidence from that discovery and expert sources, and providing the mediator and opposing parties and counsel with something of probative value to move the case to resolution. The mediation brief is the best tool for that purpose.


Read the original article here. (Subscription may be required)

Learn more about Rick’s ADR practice.

View Email as Webpage

About

Practice Areas

Attorney Profiles

Testimonials

Case

Results

Facebook  LinkedIn

Southern California

21700 Oxnard Street

Suite 1950

Woodland Hills, CA 91367

(818) 907-4000 

Northern California

555 Twin Dolphin Drive

Suite 330

Redwood City, CA 94065

(650) 365-7343 

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this newsletter constitutes advertising material. It has been created for the sole purpose of general informational use and does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion concerning any particular facts or situations. Each legal case is distinctive to its own facts and requires individualized consideration. No attorney client relationship is created as a result of accessing this newsletter or any information contained within it. No guarantees or warranties as to any particular case or matter is being communicated to any reader of this newsletter.

Please Note: This article is necessarily general in nature and is not a substitute for legal advice with respect to any particular case. Readers should consult with an attorney before taking any action affecting their interests.