Evolution and Broadening Scope of the Privette Doctrine
In her article published in For Construction Pros, Partner Michelle MacDonald examines the California Supreme Court case Privette v. Superior Court, which generally held that a hirer of an independent contractor is not liable for the negligence of the independent contractor.
In recent years, the “Privette Doctrine,” as it has become known, has both broadened in scope and evolved. MacDonald discusses the trend to broaden the reach of Privette and to narrowly construe the types of actions which fall within the exceptions of retained control and concealed hazards.
|